ARCHITECTONICS OF DISPERSION \
immersive acts and objects
October 20 - 23
Ortega y Gasset Projects
363 3rd Ave. Brooklyn, NY 11215
By JEFFREY GRUNTHANER, OCT. 2017
The performative is inherently unstable. Something about embodying the impetus of a moment refuses to reduce itself to the structure of a plan, the logic of predetermined scheduling. A recent immersive exhibition of work by NY-based artist Kuldeep Singh at Ortega Y Gasset Projects exemplified this. "Re-morphing," as Singh described, traditional aspects of Eastern art, he mounted an understated yet storied exhibition that seemed to hover in an artificial paradise of his choosing.
Comprising dance, theater, and ephemeral wall works which often involved vegetables spray-painted in crepuscular colors, the highly collaborative yet sensually decadent work of Singh recalled to mind portions of Joris-Karl Huysmans’s novel “Against Nature” (À rebours). In particular, I was reminded of that preternatural chapter which includes the following passage:
“He was the possessor of a marvelous collection of tropical plants, the result of the labors of skillful artists who knew how to follow nature and recreate her step by step, taking the flower as a bud, leading it to its full development, even imitating its decline, reaching such a point of perfection as to convey every nuance—the most fugitive expressions of the flower when it opens at dawn and closes at evening, observing the appearance of the petals curled by the wind or rumpled by the rain, applying dew drops of gum on its matutinal corollas; shaping it in full bloom, when the branches bend under the burden of their sap, or showing the dried stem and shrivelled cupules, when calyxes are thrown off and leaves fall to the ground."
I’d already spoken with Singh a few days before I saw his show, and he outlined what viewers could expect during ARCHITECTONICS OF DISPERSION. “It’s thoroughly performative. That was the whole idea: that it would exist for a shorter time. I felt this was a good opportunity to pull [together] as many people as possible.”
Despite being called “ARCHITECTONICS OF DISPERSION \ immersive acts and objects,” the actual show, at least on its third day, felt much less cluttered than the paratactic phrasing of this title might suggest. The quality of dispersion was mainly confined to some particle-like remnants from performances that had transpired over the previous two nights: a lingering restiveness which lent itself to the use of soil thickly caked to the space’s walls. This particular aspect of the exhibition seemed to quote minimalist land art, but as Singh told me: “I work a lot with delicate textiles, paper drawings, and mud. I’m very interested in this whole contrast of delicate and immediate. I generally source out mud from gardens, or parks. But this time I did get a few bags from home.”
As for the pastel-hued water colors on the walls—a couple of which were wonkily framed, as though screen-grabbed from a Tim Burton still—“they’re floating objects,” Singh explained. Singh's overarching intention of realizing a floating world, where audiences can free-associate and discover their own meaning in each work, especially came to light in a large-scale water color that gently displayed comestible figures—a pear, alongside another phallic-shaped yet indeterminate item of fruit—emerging from its diaphanous surface. Made of hard-to-find nepal paper, this piece, in the words of the artist, “usually floats on four nails, or tiny magnets.”
A decided syncretism was at play throughout Singh’s exhibition, which makes any one designation of his collaborative, multi-genre way of working feel premature. Although it’s motivated, at least in part, by Singh’s native identity (in relation to which he clarified, “Indian classical dance...becomes awareness of the body. I’m very aware of brown bodies particularly”), the personal impetus guiding ARCHITECTONICS OF DISPERSION seemed more about consolidating structured improvisation and figuring out how to work with the capacities of his collaborators. “I’m trying to locate myself as an artist internationally,” Singh told me. “You always bring these snippets, these fragments and create a liminal space, and let people make their own readings. That’s the whole idea behind the show. Architectonics are these structures—very specific units which come from a particular system of grammar.” WM
Jeffrey Grunthaner is a writer & curator based in New York. Writings have appeared via BOMB, artnet News, Archinect, Imperial Matters, Folder, Hyperallergic, Louffa Press, & others. Recent curatorial projects include the reading & dicussion series Conversations in Contemporary Poetics at Hauser & Wirth Publishers.view all articles from this author